Table of contents

What Is 5G Security? A Primer on 5G Network Security


5G security is the protection of 5G network infrastructure, data traffic, and connected users from cyber and physical threats.

It addresses the expanded attack surface introduced by virtualization, cloud-native functions, and software-defined components.

Effective 5G security requires securing both the network architecture and the services built on top of it.

 

What is the difference between 4G and 5G security?

5G introduces major architectural changes that impact how networks must be secured. Unlike 4G, which is hardware-based and centrally managed, 5G relies on virtualization, software-defined components, and distributed infrastructure.

This shift increases flexibility but also broadens the attack surface.

In 4G networks, most functions are integrated and vendor-controlled. Components operate within a fixed system, and traffic flows through well-defined paths.

That setup makes it easier to enforce uniform security. The system is simpler. And the risks are easier to isolate.

Diagram illustrating the 4G security architecture based on 3GPP TS 33.402, divided into three stratums: Application, Home/Serving, and Transport. Key components include the User, ME (Mobile Equipment), USIM, 3GPP access, Non-3GPP access, SN (Serving Network), HE (Home Environment), and user/provider applications. Numbered arrows indicate the flow of security procedures:  Security association setup and signaling between USIM, ME, access networks, SN, and HE.  Communication between SN and 3GPP access.  Mutual authentication between User and USIM.  Application-level communication between User and Provider application.  Security procedures involving Non-3GPP access and SN.  Color-coded elements distinguish roles in each stratum: purple for Application, blue for Transport, and cyan for Home/Serving.

5G is different.

Its core is disaggregated. Functions run as virtual machines or containers on shared infrastructure. Interfaces are open. And deployment spans across public and private clouds.

Diagram showing the 5G security architecture based on 3GPP TS 33.501, organized into three stratums: Application, Home/Serving, and Transport. The key components are ME (Mobile Equipment), USIM, 3GPP and Non-3GPP access, SN (Serving Network), HE (Home Environment), and user/provider applications. The diagram uses directional arrows to show security procedure flows, labeled with numbers:  Bidirectional security interactions between ME, USIM, SN, and HE.  Communication between SN and HE, and between SN and Non-3GPP access.  Internal communication between ME and USIM.  Application-layer communication between the User and Provider application.  Additional interaction between SN and HE for control and security data.  Color-coded blocks distinguish the functional roles in each stratum: purple for Application, cyan for Transport, and blue for Home/Serving. The 5G model shows a more interconnected and bidirectional structure compared to 4G.

Which means: New vulnerabilities emerge at each layer. Security controls must now account for lateral movement, misconfigurations, and exposure across multiple domains.

The model that worked for 4G doesn't scale to 5G without change.

 

What makes 5G networks harder to secure?

5G introduces new technologies that break from the more contained and predictable architecture of previous generations.

In 4G, most core functions are centralized and run on purpose-built hardware. That makes traffic flow easier to track and control. And it gives network operators clear boundaries for implementing security.

5G is different. It's decentralized, software-defined, and often cloud-hosted. Functions are virtualized and spread across shared infrastructure. Control moves closer to the edge. Open RAN replaces proprietary hardware. And interfaces between components are no longer vendor-specific.

Diagram titled '5G system-wide security coverage' illustrating how security spans across multiple domains in the 5G ecosystem. The image is divided into four vertical columns representing:  Device & Gateways (GWs)  Access & Network  Application & Cloud Infrastructure  ID Management for Users  Each column contains a vertical stack of three icons representing:  Security management (gear icon, green)  Security functions (lock icon, light green)  Trust anchor (anchor icon, teal)  These stacks are visually aligned under the banner 'System-wide security' to emphasize unified, end-to-end protection. Icons below each category represent relevant technologies, like mobile devices, cloud, base stations, and user identity.  A legend at the bottom clarifies the meaning of the three icons. A caption states: 'This diagram illustrates how security spans across multiple domains in the 5G ecosystem—from devices and access to applications and identity—under a unified, horizontal security mode.'

Here's why that matters:

The system becomes more flexible—but also more complex. The shift expands the number of exposed interfaces. It creates new dependencies between vendors and layers. And it introduces more risk of misconfiguration or lateral movement.

Network slicing adds another layer. Each slice is logically separate and tailored for a specific use case. But each slice also requires its own controls. Which means the number of policies, users, and traffic flows to secure increases significantly.

The net result:

Security has to scale across more parts of the system. And traditional perimeter-based approaches no longer apply. Instead, operators and enterprises need deeper visibility, more automation, and architecture-aware policies that account for the way 5G is built.

 

What exactly needs protecting in a 5G network?

Securing a 5G network requires protection at multiple layers.

These include the physical and virtual infrastructure, the data and signaling traffic it carries, and the users and devices that connect to it.

Each area introduces its own set of exposure points and operational considerations:

  1. Start with the infrastructure.

    In 5G, this includes base stations, radio units, edge computing nodes, and the virtualized functions that operate in cloud environments. Because many of these components are disaggregated and software-defined, they can be hosted in public, private, or hybrid environments.

    Diagram titled 'Basic 5G systems architecture' depicting the core structure and connectivity of a 5G network. At the center is a red-outlined box labeled 'Macro base station', connected via red lines (wire connections) to various sectors including the Cloud and multiple access points. Surrounding the macro base station are six key application domains: Smart city (with mmWave nodes), Smart buildings, High-speed mobile networks, Healthcare networks, Industry M2M communications, Vehicular networks.
            Each domain contains icons symbolizing the relevant technology or environment, such as towers, factories, hospitals, and vehicles. Blue lines represent wireless connections to devices and access points. Below the diagram, D2D communications (device-to-device) are also shown as part of the architecture. A legend at the bottom identifies three types of connections: Red line: 'Wire connection' Blue icon: 'Wireless connection' Green icon: 'mmWave'

    Which means infrastructure protection must account for both physical tampering and unauthorized access to virtualized assets.

  2. Then there's the traffic.

    That includes both user data and control plane signaling. These elements move across a network made up of multiple domains, operators, and services. Without proper segmentation and encryption, attackers may intercept or manipulate traffic.

    It's also possible for traffic flows to reveal sensitive patterns if metadata is not sufficiently protected.

  3. Finally, the users.

    Devices on 5G networks span a wide range of types and capabilities. From smartphones and laptops to IoT sensors and industrial equipment. This variety increases the number of potential entry points.

    And some use cases require extremely low latency, which limits how much delay security controls can introduce. Authentication, access management, and privacy safeguards must be adapted based on device type, use case, and trust level.

In other words:

What needs protecting in 5G is not just the core network. It's the full operational chain—from how traffic moves to who or what connects to it. And each part must be addressed in a way that reflects how modern 5G networks are actually deployed.

 

What are the biggest 5G security risks?

Diagram titled 'Primary 5G security risks' displaying six key cybersecurity threats in 5G networks. The left section of the image features the heading in bold black text. The right section contains six red square blocks arranged in two columns and three rows, each block containing a white icon and label:  Top-left: 'Rogue slices' (chip icon with exclamation mark)  Top-right: 'Denial-of-service (DoS)' (web browser icon)  Middle-left: 'Cloud misconfigurations' (cloud icon with warning symbol)  Middle-right: 'Eavesdropping & traffic analysis' (magnifying glass with waveform)  Bottom-left: 'Side-channel attacks' (interference icon)  Bottom-right: 'Meddler-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks' (spy silhouette)  The diagram uses consistent iconography and colors to highlight vulnerabilities at different layers of the 5G stack.

5G opens the door to new capabilities—but also new attack surfaces. The architecture introduces risks that didn't exist, or didn't matter as much, in earlier generations.

In short: 5G security risks reflect how the network is built—cloud-native, disaggregated, and programmable. Understanding the attack surface is the first step toward protecting it.

Here are the most critical ones to understand:

Rogue slices

Network slicing isolates traffic into virtual networks tailored to specific needs. But if a slice is misconfigured or hijacked, it can bypass shared controls. That creates a security gap that's hard to detect and easy to exploit.

Note:
Unlike traditional network segmentation, slices are logically isolated—but often share physical and virtual infrastructure. A compromise in orchestration or policy enforcement can cascade across slices, especially in multi-tenant environments.

Cloud misconfigurations

5G functions rely heavily on virtualized infrastructure and cloud services. A misconfigured API, unpatched container, or overly permissive access policy can expose critical systems. These issues often originate outside the traditional telecom perimeter.

Side-channel attacks

Attackers don't always need to breach software. In some cases, they can extract information from indirect signals like timing, power, or memory usage. In 5G, dense edge deployments and shared resources can increase exposure to these types of attacks.

Note:
These attacks don't exploit flaws in software code—they exploit how the system behaves. Shared CPU caches or power states in edge nodes can unintentionally leak information, even across tenants.

Denial-of-service (DoS)

Availability is a core service goal in 5G. But that also makes it a target. Attackers may flood network slices, jam radio access channels, or overload APIs. Without safeguards, even short outages can disrupt critical applications.

Eavesdropping and traffic analysis

Encryption protects data in transit—but not always metadata. Attackers who observe traffic patterns can infer user behavior, location, or application type. In dense networks, this can lead to privacy violations even without decrypting payloads.

Meddler-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks

In some cases, attackers may intercept or manipulate traffic between endpoints. This can happen through rogue base stations or weak mutual authentication. If successful, MITM attacks can compromise both confidentiality and integrity.

Note:
In 5G, rogue base stations can trick devices into connecting without triggering alarms. Unlike in previous generations, mutual authentication is supposed to prevent this—but if it's misconfigured or skipped during fallback, devices may silently downgrade to insecure connections.

 

What security features are built into 5G?

5G includes foundational security features built directly into its architecture. These features span four security domains: network access, network domain, user domain, and application domain.

Each one is responsible for protecting a different part of the system. Starting at the physical connection and extending to how apps exchange data.

Diagram titled 'Native 5G security structure across domains' illustrating the layered and interconnected components of a secure 5G architecture. The layout is divided into four vertical sections:  User interface: Depicted with a browser icon on the far left.  Cloud-based heterogeneous radio access network: Includes 'New radio', '3GPP access', and 'Non-3GPP access' technologies.  Next-gen core: Contains a block labeled 'Network function-based plane' with modules including AMF, SMF, UDM, and PCF, as well as a 'Programmable data plane'.  Application layer: Stacked vertically with 'User application', 'Network operator application', and 'Service provider application'.  Directional arrows labeled A through D show interactions:  A: Between User interface and Access network  B: Between Access network and Core network components  C: Return flow from Access network to User interface  D: Vertical communication through applications in the Application layer  The diagram demonstrates how security is natively distributed across user, radio, core, and application domains in a programmable 5G environment.
  1. Network access

    At the network access level, 5G introduces stronger mutual authentication between the user device and network. Control-plane signaling is now protected with integrity checks. Subscriber identity protection is also enhanced, replacing the unencrypted IMSI used in earlier generations with a concealed identifier to reduce tracking risk.

  2. Network domain

    Within the network domain, encryption, authentication, and integrity protections are applied between functions like the access network and 5G core. Because the architecture is software-defined, many of these protections also apply across virtualized functions and service-based interfaces. Network slicing introduces logical isolation between services, supported by separate policy controls (PCF) and user data management (UDM) for each slice.

  3. User domain

    On the user side, 5G supports more complex trust models. Mutual authentication can now include not just the mobile device and operator—but also service providers or other third parties. This flexibility supports different use cases but also adds complexity to identity management.

  4. Application domain

    Finally, at the application domain level, 5G specifies secure messaging between apps, user equipment, and providers. These mechanisms support integrity and confidentiality across service layers—even in environments with shared infrastructure.

Note:
While 5G defines these capabilities, not all of them are mandatory. Some protections are optional or left to vendors and implementers. Which means: Actual security depends on more than just what 5G defines. It depends on how consistently those features are applied across the network.

 

Who's responsible for keeping 5G secure?

Security in 5G isn't someone else's job. Responsibility is shared—clearly, but not equally.

Communications service providers (CSPs) lead the charge. They design, deploy, and operate the infrastructure. So they're directly accountable for hardening the radio access network (RAN), securing the 5G core, and implementing industry standards like 3GPP-defined authentication and encryption.

But that's not the full picture.

Enterprises play a different role. They use slices and services built on top of CSP infrastructure. This includes deploying their own applications, enforcing endpoint and session-level security, and securing edge workloads. If a slice is compromised or misconfigured—say, due to poor policy controls or insecure application logic—it often starts with the enterprise, not the provider.

Now zoom out.

Governments shape the environment. Agencies like DHS, CISA, NIST, and the FCC set standards, fund testbeds, and publish threat models. Their work ensures CSPs and tech vendors meet baseline expectations around supply chain, resiliency, and cross-border trust. And globally? They push for secure, interoperable standards through partnerships like 3GPP and the ITU.

In other words: Everyone has a part. But each party must understand their scope.

Without that, 5G's complexity becomes a liability. Because when responsibility is blurred, threats slip through.

 

Which environments demand the strongest 5G security?

Diagram titled '5G deployment areas with critical security needs' featuring three highlighted sectors arranged in a circular layout, each connected to a central curved path. On the left side, bold black text displays the title. On the right side, three sectors are shown with icons and labels:  Top right:  Blue circular icon with a hospital symbol  Label: 'Enterprise private 5G'  Description: 'Factory automation, healthcare, logistics'  Center right:  Orange circular icon with a city skyline and circuit traces  Label: 'Smart cities'  Description: 'Transportation, surveillance, public services'  Bottom right:  Blue circular icon with a factory symbol  Label: 'Critical infrastructure'  Description: 'Energy, utilities, defense'  The visual emphasizes the importance of cybersecurity in these mission-critical areas during 5G deployment.

5G security matters most in environments where risk tolerance is low and operational disruption can have serious consequences. These are the pressure zones: places where 5G is either already in production or rapidly expanding into high-stakes applications.

Start with enterprise private 5G.

These are custom-built networks deployed by organizations to support factory automation, logistics, healthcare, or large-scale campuses.

Because private 5G networks often integrate tightly with production systems and IoT devices, a vulnerability doesn't just affect data—it can impact physical operations. That means compromised access control, delayed industrial automation, or unauthorized commands to devices.

Security controls need to account for both traditional IT risks and the broader cyber-physical consequences of an incident.

Then there are smart cities.

These urban environments rely on dense 5G infrastructure to power transportation systems, traffic sensors, surveillance, public Wi-Fi, and emergency services. The attack surface is massive.

And because systems are interconnected, compromise in one part of the network—like a traffic management system—can lead to downstream effects.

Maintaining availability, enforcing integrity, and verifying device trust become critical.

Finally, critical infrastructure.

5G is increasingly being explored as a communications backbone for sectors like energy, utilities, and defense. These networks operate with strict reliability requirements and minimal tolerance for disruption.

For example: Slicing may be used to isolate grid operations from public services. But if isolation or authentication breaks down, the results could be serious.

Security must ensure continuous service, enforce robust identity management, and maintain visibility into network and device behavior at all times.

 

What's next for 5G security?

5G security is evolving. The ecosystem is growing more complex, and legacy defenses can't keep pace.

New operational models, such as 5G-specific security operations centers (SOCs), are starting to take shape.

These SOCs focus on the unique characteristics of 5G infrastructure. That includes slice visibility, identity authentication, and latency-sensitive threats.

Another shift involves policy enforcement.

As slicing becomes more dynamic and granular, organizations need slice-aware policies that reflect how traffic flows and who owns what. Traditional network segmentation doesn't map cleanly to this architecture. Which means: Policies must be smarter and more contextual.

AI is also entering the picture. Not just for analytics—but for decision-making.

AI-in-the-loop defense can support real-time response in highly distributed environments. Especially where patterns aren't obvious to human analysts. It's early, but this kind of automation could reduce manual overhead and improve detection at the edge.

Looking ahead, 6G previews are already hinting at what's to come.

Tighter integration with AI, more precise device positioning, and expanded use of terahertz spectrum will likely introduce new security challenges. But also opportunities to rethink how networks are secured at the protocol level.

Important: These developments won't necessarily make security easier. But they will change how it needs to be done. That means teams will need to adapt their approaches, tools, and assumptions.

CTA banner featuring a light teal background with a circle graphic containing a book. Text within the banner reads Explore new strategies for protecting users, applications and infrastructure. and includes a Download guide button.

 

5G security FAQs

Security improvements have been made to 5G infrastructure compared to previous wireless iterations. For example, network slicing divides an underlying physical network infrastructure into a set of logically isolated, self-contained, independent and secured virtual networks. On the other hand, such infrastructure changes also introduce new considerations with respect to security.
The implementation of 5G networks introduces a different array of potential security threats. These include but are not limited to side-channel attacks, lack of visibility and security controls, increased attack surface, and connected devices. However, 5G security architecture incorporates new enhancements for encryption, authentication and user privacy.
Risks include rogue network slices, cloud misconfigurations, side-channel attacks, DoS, traffic analysis, and MITM attacks. These stem from 5G’s virtualized, disaggregated, and programmable architecture, which expands the attack surface.
4G is centralized and hardware-based. 5G is decentralized, virtualized, and cloud-hosted. It offers more flexibility but introduces new attack surfaces. Security must now address lateral movement, interface exposure, and domain-specific risks.
5G includes stronger authentication, subscriber identity protection, encryption between virtualized functions, and slice isolation. These built-in features improve confidentiality, integrity, and access control across the network.
5G is generally more secure than WiFi due to stronger built-in protections and mandatory authentication standards. However, its security still depends on consistent implementation and proper configuration.
Yes. 5G defines built-in protections across access, network, user, and application domains. But some features are optional or vendor-dependent—so actual security depends on how consistently they’re implemented.
5G uses open interfaces, virtualized functions, and shared infrastructure. Control is distributed, and slicing increases complexity. Security must scale across more layers and domains, beyond traditional perimeter models.
Yes. Enterprises that use private 5G or manage slices are responsible for securing edge workloads, apps, and session-level controls—especially when their infrastructure extends beyond the CSP's domain.
Each slice must be independently secured, monitored, and segmented. Misconfigured or hijacked slices can bypass shared controls, creating difficult-to-detect vulnerabilities across shared infrastructure.
Yes. Traditional models don’t scale to 5G’s architecture. Operators and enterprises need architecture-aware policies, automation, and deeper visibility into virtualized functions, slices, and interfaces.
Previous What Is the Difference Between IoT and OT Security?
Next What Is ICS Security? | Industrial Control Systems Security